Loading...

Daniel Webster’s Big Trout

One of the many stories or legends still told of early Brookhaven/South Haven is that of the famous Senator Daniel Webster, and of the monstrous trout caught in the pond below the Samuel Carman’s mills on the Connecticut or Carmen’s river.

The New York Gazette of 29 June 1821, is said to have reported: “A very large salmon-trout, weighing thirteen pounds eight ounces, and three feet in length, and seventeen inches round, was caught by Mr. Samuel Carman, Jr., in his pond at Fire-Place, Long Island, on the 24th inst.” The New York Evening Post is said to have confirmed the story “by three of our most respectable citizens.”

The above accounts likely report the origin event that led to the “Webster” trout legend which became much embellished with time. It is interesting to note that Daniel Webster was not mentioned in these origin accounts.

Others, however, date the Webster trout event variously dates in the 1820s. Sources for these dates have not yet been found.

There are several artifacts still extant almost two centuries after the event which assist in telling the story. One is a wooden carved weathervane said to have been based on an original drawing made at the time of the catch, and which, for a time, rested atop the South Haven Presbyterian Church steeple; another is a Currier and Ives lithograph thought by some (generally in fishing circles) to depict Daniel Webster catching the trout in the river; and the third is a plaque on a pew in the nearby old South Haven Presbyterian Church identifying the Suffolk Club, a well know hunting and fishing club which occupied the banks of the river and to which Daniel Webster is said to have been associated, at least in its early 19th century iteration.

There is little question that Daniel Webster and Samuel Carman were friends, and that Webster, along with other wealthy and influential New Yorkers, regularly visited the Carman tavern and inn to fish in the adjacent river. However, there is little contemporaneous evidence that Webster himself caught the record-sized trout, or that the event took place in the context of a Sunday morning church service, as some recount below.

“Fish stories” are not always told by fishermen.

Pictured below is said to be the trout that, in the 1895 Brooklyn Eagle article below, was “sawed out of an inch board, and this Mr. Carman had rigged up as a weather vane for his barn, and it is still doing duty to show the way the wind blows at the Carman homestead.”

It, or another facsimile, early on became the weathervane atop the steeple of the South Haven Presbyterian Church across the road from the Carman homestead/inn.  It was said to have been struck by lightning and fell to the ground.  The original of this fish weathervane is now on loan by the church to the Bellport-Brookhaven Historical Society museum.  In 1976, two replicas of this fish were made, one of which was placed atop the Presbyterian church steeple, the other atop a flag-pole at the historical society.

The fish was reluctant to maintain its perch, however, and was twice dislodged after 1976—the most recent in a violent nor’easter on March 13, 2010, with recorded winds of 60-75+ mph, which caused considerable damage across Long Island.

Some have suggested that the so-called “Daniel Webster” trout caught in the Carman’s River was probably what is known as a “salmon-trout” which, it is said, can grow to enormous size, and spends part of its life cycle in salt water. See Richard A. Thomas references, this page.

Old South Haven
Church Steeple, 1990

In addition to the above mention in the New York Gazette and New York York Evening Post, the giant fish is mentioned in the Niles Weekly Register of the same period—specifically attributing its capture to Samuel Carmen, Jr.

Niles’ Weekly Register, edited by Hezekiah Niles, Vol. 20, from March to September 1821, p. 304*
Trout, a very large one

Mammoth trout.  At “Fireplace,” Long Island, about 70 miles from New-York, Mr. Samuel Carman, jun. on the 25th ult. caught at the “tail of his saw mill” a trout three feet in length and 17 inches round the girth, and weighing 13 lbs. 8 oz.  It was kept alive in a pen several days for the gratification of the curious, the largest trout ever caught before, in the remembrance of the oldest inhabitants, never having exceeded 5 lbs. in weight—seldom being more than 2½ lbs.

*Niles’ Weekly Register containing Political, Historical, Geographical, Scientifical, Statistical, Economical, and Biographical Documents, Essays, and Facts; Together with Notices of the Arts and Manufactures, and a Record of the Events of the Times; H. Niles, Editor.

The following article from the Brooklyn Eagle is the first account of the trout legend so far found that connects Daniel Webster with a huge trout caught in the Carman’s River.  While modern telling of the story has Daniel Webster catching the fish, we have not found any 19th century accounts where Webster is the actual fisherman.  In this account he just purchases the trout at extraordinary cost after it has been captured by others.  If one were to read just the headlines, one can see how the legend was beginning to develop.

It is also interesting to note that in this account no mention is made of the South Haven Presbyterian Church, or that the drama of the fish’s capture has anything to do with the church.

Many local skeptics believe that the fish was caught by some anonymous local, or perhaps Samuel Carman himself, and embellished, as fishermen are wont to do, over the decades.

The major focus of this this article is the dispute between landowners—in this case the famous Suffolk Club and the Tangier Smith family—over who actually owned the Carman’s River.  This was a dispute that continued into the 20th century.

The Brooklyn Daily Eagle—Sunday, 15 December. 1895

DANIEL WEBSTER’S BIG TROUT.

It Weighed Fourteen Pounds and was Caught on Long Island.

HIS TRIPS TO CARMAN’S RIVER.

Autograph Letters of the Great Jurist Produced in a Law Suit at Riverhead, Showing That He Did What He Could for His Old Friend, Samuel Carman, in a Dispute With the Long Island Railroad

An interesting ejectment suit involving the title to important fishing grounds at Carman’s river, South Haven, was decided at the last session of the Suffolk county court, at Riverhead.  The plaintiffs in the suit were William E. T. Smith and others and the Suffolk club was the defendant.  The plaintiffs claimed title to the territory stretching north from the south country road along the river.  They are the sons and daughters of the late Egbert Tangier Smith and claim title to the property in question by virtue of deeds and wills dating back to the seventeenth century, their claim resting mainly on an old colonial patent.  The Suffolk club, the defendant, which was organized in 1865, is composed of men so wealthy that a candidate for membership must be worth at least $500,000 before he can be as much as proposed.  The club claimed to own ninety acres of land there and to hold many more acres leased property, together with the fishing and hunting privileges of Henry Carman.  They traced their claim to Samuel Carman, Henry’s father, who owned all the land and their streams and fishing privileges by deeds from the first settlers.  To substantiate this claim ex-Judge Reid and August Haviland, who appeared for the club, submitted two autograph letters of Daniel Webster, to show that in an old action in which Carman was once involved with the Long Island, Webster, who was an old friend of Carman, had examined the deeds and found that he was the identical owner of the property, streams and fishing privileges involved in the suit then being tried.  In spite of the autograph testimony of the great jurist the jury found for the plaintiff in the sum of $250 damages.

Mr. Haviland, who is the custodian of the Webster letters, intrusted (sic) an Eagle representative with the shorter epistle to Samuel Carman, in order that it be reproduced in fac simile, and here it is.

That Webster made use of his franking privilege to forward the letter, as was the custom with United States senators and representatives at that time, is clear from the envelope, of which this is a reproduction:

The copy of the letter to Mr. King, which Webster inclosed (sic) to his friend Carman, is as follows:

Boston, March 31, 1845.

My dear sir—I was at Fire Place last week and Mr. Carman consulted me professionally on the subject of the of the Long Island railroad in making a dam over the river, etc. He placed his deeds in my hands that I might see what his title really and actually is.

I find that he is owner of all the land on the west side of the river from his house northerly to the north line of the George’s or Smith’s manor and I find also by express grant in all the deeds he is sole owner of the whole stream. His eastern boundary thereof is the easternj edge of the stream or its banks from the crossing place below his mill to the northern line of the patent which is half or three-quarters of a mile north of the railroad.

In damming up this stream it is clear that the company are mere tresspassers (sic) and he has a right clearly to abate the nuisance by taking away the dam if he pleases. But he is well disposed and reasonable and I am sure that the company will not be less so.

The dam is injurious to him in several ways. First it renders the supply of water to his own mill below less regular. Secondly, it completely cuts off the passage up and down of the fish and must destroy the whole race, by depriving them of their spawning grounds. This is no small matter, considering the value and use of his establishments, but finally, the site would make a mill power for his own use equal, as he thinks, to the one below.

It strikes me the cause is one for compromise and adjustment.

You are interested in the company and know all the gentlemen and I am very sincere friend to the road and shall advise Mr. Carman to be reasonable and equitable and have no doubt he will be so. The matter of the passage for fish can be well enough provided for by suitable stairs or path to let them up and down and the rest is the proper subject for just estimate.

I told Mr. Carman that I would write you when I had considered the subject, as he looks on you as friendly to him, and at the same time that you have an interest in the road.

Probably I may see you in New York in the course of next week.

DANL. WEBSTER

Hon. Jno. King.

Fire Place, to which Webster refers in his letter, is now known as South Haven and sometimes by the old name of Carman’s river. It lies on the west side of the river, about two miles from its mouth, and has now, as it had in 1845, an inviting, quiet, homelike air about it. It was at a spot near there that the Suffolk club built its handsome club house, and having secured the privilege of fishing in the stream from Uncle Sam Carman as he was familiarly known. It was a celebrated fishing spot and lovers of of the sport from all parts of the country came there to fish. His guest included the fine men of the country in those days. Uncle Sam is described as a most sociable boniface, and he was Uncle Sam to everybody. His wife was a jolly woman, too, and any visitor was made to feel at right at home at the Carman homestead.

Uncle Sam and Webster were great friends, and Webster came there to fish for twenty years or more. The company always had plenty of brandy, and together with lots of tobacco, the evenings were spent around the old fashioned fireplace of Uncle Sam’s house in a jolly, sociable manner. The old Carman homestead still stands in a well preserved condition. It is occupied by Henry W. Carman, Sam’s son, and Nathaniel Miller’s wife, of Brookhaven is a daughter of Uncle Sam Carman. Uncle Sam was a miller, which, in those days, made him very popular, for people came to his mill from miles around. It was a grist mill and he did a thriving business. His sons now run the mill, which has been in operation for more than 120 years.

An interesting incident in the life of Uncle Sam is told by an old personal friend of his. Uncle Sam was a great lover of the pipe and smoked almost incessantly. Mart Raynor from the manor was also a great smoker, and the question arose who could smoke the most. A wager was made to decide it, and they they were to smoke and eat nothing save bunkers, a quantity of which were prepared for the occasion. After smoking constantly for two days and nights they gave it up and called it a draw.

The largest trout ever caught on Long Island was caught in Carman’s river. It weighed fourteen pounds, and when news of the wonderful catch reached Daniel Webster he went down with a party of friends and paid $100 for the trout, which was served at a big dinner given to Webster’s friends in New York city. Some of those who accompanied Webster on this fishing trip to Uncle Sam Carman’s were Attorney General Hoffman, Philo T. Ruggles, the celebrated lawyer; Chief Justice Thomas J. Oakley, Judge William S. Rockwell, George P. Barker, David Graham, Henry A. Cram, James A Gerard and John J. Crittenden, senator from Kentucky.

Before Mr. Carman parted with the big trout a fac simile of it was sawed out of an inch board, and this Mr. Carman had rigged up as a weather vane for his barn, and it is still doing duty to show the way the wind blows at the Carman homestead.

The occasion of Webster’s letter arose out of a dispute between Carman and the Long Island Railroad company as to whether the latter had a right to construct an embankment that would back up the water the celebrated trout stream. Uncle Sam wrote to his friend Webster asking for legal advice upon the subject, and the result was that Webster took up the cause of his ole friend and wrote the letter quoted above to John A. King, then acting as the representative of the road, in the matter.

Mr. Carman later received another letter from Webster which is also a cherished heirloom. It seems that Webster, during his twenty annual visits to Uncle Sam’s had never paid him a cent for his accommodation. After the matter was satisfactorily settled with the road Webster wrote Carman saying: “I would charge anyone else fifty dollars ($50) for this advice. So you can credit me with fifty dollars on our account.”

By the 1930s, this Webster legend had grown such that, as the story now goes, Daniel Webster was attending the church service at the Presbyterian church nearby when a slave/servant came in and loudly whispered to Webster that the giant fish was seen in the pond. Webster quickly got up and left. The remaining congregation also soon went outside and lined the pond’s bank, causing the minister to terminate his sermon and join them. Webster then makes a dramatic catch, has the wood carving made, and takes the fish to New York where a feast is prepared hosted by Webster at Delmonico’s.

This version, as detailed by the Rev. George Borthwick (known for his story telling) in his book The Church at the South, A History of the South Haven Church, now takes three pages to tell.

The Church at the South: A History of the South Haven Church.  Rev. George Borthwick.
Original manuscript c. 1939; published 1989. p. 186ff.
Daniel Webster’s Big Trout

The [Carmans] river which furnished power for [Samuel Carman’s] mills was noted for the trout it contained, and he capitalized on that. So great was the reputation of this stream among fishermen that a historian of that day states the common opinion that its trout fishery was “superior to any other in this part of the country.” Hither came groups of fishermen by stage-coach from New York City, staying during their visit in South Haven at the tavern. Of one such group, composed of Sen. Daniel Webster, Phillip Hone, Walter Bowne, Martin Van Buren, and John and Edward Stevens, is told a story the historicity of which is beyond question.

The details of this story, as they have come down through the years since that day in 1827 when it took place, have been colored by the countless tellings of one person to another. The common tradition states that Daniel Webster had tried unsuccessfully for some time to hook a huge trout which he knew was in the river. One Sunday morning, after instructing one of Sam Carman’s Negroes to watch the stream by the mill to see if he could get a glimpse of the monster, he went to the church across the way with his host. “Priest” King’s long sermon had not reached “ninthly” before the Negro had crept into the church up to the front pew in which sat Sam Carman and Senator Webster. In a whisper which excitement made so loud that it was heard by all the worshippers near the pew, he informed Mr. Webster that the fish was lazily swimming in a pool below the mill. Daniel Webster tiptoed out, and then Samuel Carman, and then boys who managed to elude the watchful eyes of their parents. Finally, curiosity overcame so many of the people that Mr. King, realizing his sermon was reaching the ears of a constantly diminishing congregation, concluded it, gave the benediction, and went over to the mill with the remainder of his flock to watch Daniel Webster catch what proved to be the second largest trout on record. It was some time before the delighted fisherman got a bite from the fish. Suddenly the Senator felt his line tighten and saw thrashing on the end of it the trout which he had long hoped to catch. It was an opportunity of which fishermen dream, but which rarely comes to them. With the excited advice of the worshippers of the South Haven Church, he played the huge fish skillfully until finally he had landed it with his net. There on the ground lay a trout, which when weighed, tipped the scales at 14.5 pounds – a quarter of a pound lighter than the present world’s record, according to the magazine FIELD AND STREAM, which carried this story. Such an event was too important to allow to pass unrecorded. As there were no cameras in that day, the fish was put up against the wall of Sam Carman’s house, and its outline was drawn there. Phillip Hone, copying it, had a weathervane cut out of cherry, one third larger than the trout, so that it would appear the natural size when seen from the ground. He gilded it, and had it placed on top of the South Haven Church spire. There for about half a century it pointed the direction of the wind and reminded the parishioners of their distinguished visitor who had performed so notably in a field in which history does not remember him. One summer’s afternoon, during a thunder-storm, a bolt of lightning struck that steeple, knocked off the wooden fish, and killed a mule that had taken shelter against the side of the church below. The fish can still be seen, weather-beaten and nicked by the storms that have blown about it, in the possession of a church member, Mr. George Miller, the great grandson of Samuel Carman, who had played host to the distinguished fisherman.

Daniel Webster, celebrating this feat with his friends that night before a blazing fire in the tavern, drank too much of Carman’s rum. Tradition states that he became so intoxicated that he could not find his way to his room upstairs, and had to be carried up by his host. The fish he caught was taken to New York City, and there at famous Delmonico’s, cooked and served at a banquet which the Senator gave for his friends. So pleased was he with his good luck, he sent Sam Carman a purse of $100 and came back again many times with his friends Phillip Hone, Walter Bowne, Martin Van Buren, and John and Edward Stevens. They later rented land on the river, hired fishing privileges from Mr. Carman, and formed the nucleus of a group which years after became known as “The Suffolk Club,” widely recognized as the wealthiest club of its size in the world. One of its famous members was Theodore Roosevelt. This organization must have been composed, at least in part, of regular church-goers, for they reserved for themselves a pew in the center of the church, with the words “Suffolk Club” engraved on it.

An expanded bibliography of trout references, especially as they relate to Long Island, New York. By Dr. Richard A. Thomas. 6 July 2011.

In addition to the references displayed on this page, Dr. Thomas, in this bibliography, lists other references to trout (including their textual content), especially “big” trout, as they may relate to Webster’s “trout.”

Catching a Trout, We Hab You Now, Sar!—While the subject of this N. Currier lithographFootnote is widely reported, both locally and elsewhere, as being of Daniel Webster and his slave (or servant) at the Carman’s River in South Haven, L.I., NY, the preponderance of evidence is that it has nothing to do with either Daniel Webster nor the catching of a giant trout in the Carman’s River.. It was done by Otto Knirsch ca. 1854-7 after a painting by Arthur Fitzwilliam TaitFootnote some 35 years after the reputed Daniel Webster incident.

See Dr. Richard A. Thomas: Notes on “Catching a Trout.”

When the association between the print and Daniel Webster came about hasn’t been established; except it was well known that Daniel Webster was a trout fisherman and a friend of Samuel Carman, proprietor of the mill and pond, and the inn on its shore. Perhaps some thought the person in the print bore a resemblance to Daniel Webster. 1854 is long after the event—Daniel Webster and the Big Trout—supposedly occurred, and the association of that event with this N. Currier print seems to be of fairly recent origin. Rev. George Borthwick, in his telling of the story (pp. 186-189 in The Church at the South, A History of the South Haven Church, completed in 1939 but not published until 1982) makes no mention of the lithograph. Other evidence appears to demolish the claim that the print shows Daniel Webster catching a fish in the pool below Samuel Carman’s mills at Fire Place (or anywhere else, for that matter).

An original of this lithograph is on loan to the Bellport-Brookhaven Historical Society museum by the Old South Haven Presbyterian church.

The following article, from a 1906 issue of Forest and Stream (predecessor to Field and Stream) provides a somewhat more fanciful account of the great trout. In this account, Daniel Webster is not present at its capture. However the drama of the event now involves a Sunday service at the Presbyterian church.

In the account, the fish is caged in, but allowed to live for a time. Daniel Webster is notified of the trout’s capture, orders that it be kept alive until he can travel out to the Island. He purchases it for a reasonable amount, and returns with it to New York City where it is served at a private dinner party.

Forest and Stream, Saturday, June 23, 1906, p. 999

The Webster Trout

The thriving little city of Patchogue out on Long Island is the center of a trout district that before the day of private preserves could not be beaten either for big fish or ease in getting at them. Even now sport can be had there if one knows where to go. Almost every male in the town is a trout fisherman, but the chief by common consent is Judge A. H. CarmanAstor House Footnote, president of the Carman River Fishing Club. The Judge can tell a good story well, as witness the following:

“This region was the favorite fishing ground of Daniel Webster. He would begin at the bay and fish our streams back to their source in the middle of the island, ten or twelve miles. Henry Clay sometimes fished with him. There was a big trout in Carman’s River they could never get to take the hook; neither could any one else, though scores had seen him. and according to the stories told he was as big as a small whale.

“One hot June day, when all the townspeople were at church and the minister had just got to his sixthly, Carman’s little nigger boy rushed in, mouth open, eyes bulging, one hand holding up his baggy trousers, and yelling, ‘The big trout is in the hole! The big trout is in the hole!’ All knew what hole was meant. It was a spring under a big willow tree, where Carman’s dairy house had once stood, and sent a little brook into the river. So every man and boy in the house was on his feet in an instant.

“‘Hold on, brethren,’ shouted the parson, who was a fisherman himself, ‘let’s all have a fair start.’ Then they made a rush across the fields for the old spring hole, the women and girls tagging after. Arrived there, their first thought was to stop up the entrance, then they got out Carman’s old menhaden seine that hadn’t seen the water in ten years and was full of holes, and wrapped it round and round the sides and bottom of the hole, while the big trout made the water boil as an accompaniment.

“At last, having him hard and fast, they went back and completed their devotions. Next day some one sent a telegram to Webster, and he sent back a check of ten dollars for the trout, and ordered him held alive until he arrived. He came as soon as the stage coach could bring him, and in his presence the trout was taken out, laid on a broad oak plank and his outline carefully drawn with chalk. From this a weather vane was cut out and swung on Sam Carman’s mill for years, or until a West India cyclone came up the coast and split it so it fell. It is still in existence, however, and you will find it in the shop of Nathaniel Miller, one of. our oldest residents.

“Webster took the trout to New York, invited in all his friends and made a grand banquet of it in the Astor House Astor House Footnote, where he always stopped when in the city. The feast was held in the northeast room, second floor, the Vesey street and Broadway corner.

“There is a boy at Artist Lake, where I some times go fishing for black bass,” continued the Judge, “who will be a millionaire if he lives. It is a pretty little sheet of water several miles cast of Ronkonkoma, and I usually have better luck there than at the larger and better known lake. One day when I was going up I wrote to this boy in advance and told him to have all the small frogs he could get at the lake on a certain day. He demanded two cents apiece, which I agreed to pay. Well, we got there, and there was my boy with a dry-goods box full of frogs, and a cheese cloth over them to keep them from hopping out. He had enlisted all the small boys and scoured the country for miles around. It cost me five dollars to settle the bill.” C. B. T.

This article from Early American Life provides a modern, even more fanciful telling of the events.

Early American Life, Volume 6 By Early American Society, April 1975, p. 4ff. Historical Times, Inc, Cowles Magazines, Inc.

This Month’s Weathervane

We are indebted to Jamie Pokorny, who recently spent a month as part of our EAS editorial staff on a brief internship in connection with her college studies, for the following story, which she wrote to describe her favorite weathervane: The South Haven, New York, weathervane is a 150-year-old replica of a trout, carved in cherry wood and measuring four feet by one foot.

Until very recently, Long Island was a sportsman’s paradise. Farming was the principal source of livelihood, wildlife flourished in woodlands and meadows, and natives boasted that Long Island streams offered some of the best trout fishing in the Northeast.

One fishing enthusiast was Daniel Webster, American lawyer and statesman of the early 19th century. Along with friends Martin Van Buren, Philip Hone (New York businessman and mayor of the city in 1825), and John and Edward Stevens (New York inventors and engineers of steamboat and rail transportation fame), Webster often stayed in the village of South Haven at the tavern owned and operated by Samuel Carmen.

Carmen play an influential role in the village of South Haven. Besides the tavern, he owned a general store and several mills located on a river that today bears his name. Like most general stores of the early 1800’s, Sam Carmen’s stocked everything from thimbles and shoes to snuff and rum! His shop also doubled as post office and bank. Carmen’s grist mills ground the local wheat and corn, and his sawmills cut into timber the pine and oak logs felled in nearby forests.

Since there were no public buildings in South Haven, Carmen’s tavern gained prestige as a political center. Meetings and elections were held there, and because the weekly stagecoach from Brooklyn to Sag Harbor made a scheduled stop at the tavern, it became a center for the dissemination of news.

On a Sunday morning in 1823, Daniel Webster was attending morning service at the South Haven Presbyterian Church located very near to Carmen’s River. Webster had been trying vainly for several days to hook a giant trout said to inhabit the river. The sermon had hardly begun when one of Carmen’s employees, who had been posted to watch for the fish, tiptoed into the church and whispered in Webster’s ear. Webster followed the man out and headed for a small pool in the stream. Sam Carmen, unable to contain his curiosity, soon left the church, followed by several small boys. More and more of the congregation drifted out, for the “big fish” was a local legend. The Reverend “Priest” King eventually cut short his sermon, gave the benediction, and himself sped to the mill pond!

Daniel Webster was successful, and hooked a 14½-pound trout that, until 1935, was the second largest trout ever caught in America. A record of the fish was made by a tracing of its outline on the wall of Carmen’s house. Webster, while celebrating his success, is said to have drunk too much of Carmen’s rum and was carried upstairs by the proprietor. It is a fact that Webster later sent Carmen one hundred dollars and returned often to fish.

The trout was taken to the famous Delmonico’s restaurant in New York City and provided the main course for a banquet given by Webster for his friends.

To apologize for disrupting Sunday service, and to leave a reminder of Webster’s feat, Philip Hone ordered a weathervane carved in the exact likeness of the trout, but one-third larger. It was gilded and erected on the steeple of the South Haven church.

A few years later, Webster and his friends formed a fishing group. Among its members through the years have been many wealthy and influential men, including Theodore RooseveltFootnote. They rented land and fishing privileges from Sam Carmen and became known The Suffolk Club, “widely recognized as the wealthiest club of its size in the world .” A pew with a metal plate inscribed “Suffolk Club” remains in the church today.

In 1873 the church steeple was struck by lightning and the vane came down. It was replaced by a more permanent vane. Webster’s trout is now located in the pastor’s home.

In 1960 the South Haven Church was moved a few miles to the small hamlet of Brookhaven. The structure, though, hasn’t changed much since the early 1800’s and the story of Daniel Webster and his trout is still a popular one in the area.

The content or format of this subpage last updated: 09/28/2012 15:07:48

And this version adds even more details to the “fish tale.”

Trout, Volume 1
Ernest George Schwiebert
E.P. Dutton, 1984 – 1834 pages

American Species of Trout and Grayling “The Aphrodite of the Hemlocks”

p. 245

Many early figures like Cotton Mather, Joseph Secombe, Daniel Webster, and Henry Ward Beecher were often found on [Long Island] trout water. Brook trout from the slow-flowing Nissequogue and weedy little Carman’s River on Long Island were favorites of Daniel Webster, and the region still abounds in anecdotes about his brook-trout fishing. There are two versions of Daniel Webster and his record brook trout on Long Island. One has the site of its capture as the millpond of the old Wyandanche Club on the Nissequogue. The other version places the capture of the giant fish outside the graceful colonial church at Brookhaven, where Webster and his friends often fished at the Suffolk Club.

Brookhaven is still a quiet village among the beach-grass dunes and sheltered harbors of the South Shore. Its snug colonial saltboxes and elm-shaded streets have a special character, dominated by the slender bell tower of its Presbyterian church, built by local shipwrights in 1745. Such a patina of time is often enough to give a church some measure of fame, but this church is also part of the Webster legend. One hundred forty years ago its congregation apparently witnessed his legendary exploit with with the giant brook trout. Evidence supporting the story is relatively meagre: it consists of a carved cherrywood facsimile of the fish, obscure records and diaries, the brass plate of the Suffolk Club in one of the church pews, and the famous Currier & Ives lithograph of Webster catching the trout—a colorful lithograph that ultimately became part of the Congressional Record in 1854.

Webster himself is part of American folk legend, and his fame lies in several directions: orator, statesman, lawyer, congressman, and fly-fisherman. Webster was born at Franklin in the White Mountains of New Hampshire in 1782 and graduated from Dartmouth College. During both his boyhood and his college years Webster spent much time fishing the mountain brooks and brook-trout ponds of New Hampshire. He was elected to the Congress in 1813, and soon moved his residence to Boston. The legendary Dartmouth College case first gave him great fame as an attorney in 1819, and his defense of the United States Treasury in McCullough vs. Maryland cemented his reputation in the circles of power. His growing fame soon brought him into contact with men like Martin Van Buren, who would become president of the United States in 1837; Philip Hone, the mayor of the city of New York; and John Stevens, pioneer developer of steamboats, boilers, and locomotives. These men were all dedicated fly-fishers, and they subsequently invited Daniel Webster to join their Suffolk Fishing Club on Long Island.

Webster became a senator from Massachusetts in 1827, having established law offices in both Boston and New York. History tells us that he loved the brook-trout rivers found on eastern Long Island, and that his circle of fishing friends spent many weekends in the Fireplace Tavern operated by Sam Carman. It was a hard-fishing crew, fond of free-flowing rum and conversation that regularly gathered in front of his hearth, although each Sunday morning found them across the road in the Presbyterian church, nursing tehir headaches in the pew reserved for the Suffolk Club.

It was a bright spring morning in 1823 when Philip Hone first discovered the huge brook trout in the little river below Carman’s Tavern. Hone quickly found Webster and both men tried their luck for several hours without interesting the fish. Webster became obsessed with the huge brook trout, but it was four years later before he saw it again. Webster and Hone had left on the last Friday stagecoach from Booklyn, and arrived at the Fireplace Tavern long after dark. They found the dining room alive with stories of the giant fish. Downstream from the tavern Sam Carman also operated a general store and grist mill and that afternoon his employees had been working on its water wheel. When the work ù dismantling the big cypress-framed wheel ù had started, the huge brook trout had darted out from the millrace into the weedy channel upstream.

Webster and Hone fished the millpond through the following day without locating the big trout again. Saturday night found them commiserating their poor luck in Jamaican rum with liberal tankards of Carman’s of Carman’s hard cider for variety, and both men were ultimately carried to bed by Carman’s black servants. It proved a difficult and restless night. The following Sunday morning both men were faithfully seated in the pew across the road, perhaps groaning inwardly that the Presbyterian sense of austerity forbade such ornamental amenities as as stained-glass windows that might reduce the glare and mollify their headaches. Carman accompanied them to services that morning, but left instructions that his servant Lige should stand watch at the millpond for the giant trout. It was a beautiful spring morning and every man in the church stared longingly at the little river, with its pale willows and shadbush blooming and the ruby-colored buds of the swamp maples in the bend above the grist mill.

Parson Jedediah King was also a fly-fisherman but his long-winded sermons typically lasted all morning, and that morning was no King droned endlessly about temptation, the eternal faults of mankind, wickedness, hellfire and and brimstone, gluttony,, carnality ù and fixing his fierce blue-gray eyes on the Suffolk Club pew, debated the evils of cider and Jamaican rum. The sermon lasted an eternity itself. Shall we gather at the river, the congregation finally chorused, , the beautiful, beautiful river? The hymn finally ended, but the service still had thirty-odd minutes left.

There was a soft scraping at the churchyard door just as the congregation was settling for a second harangue from Parson King. Carman knew instantly what it was, and turned to see his servant Lige tiptoeing along the side aisle. Lige had located the big brook trout in the millpond, and only his orders to report sighting the fish could have forced Lige to interrupt Parson King and his morning services.

Lige slipped into the pew, and whispered to his employer briefly. Senator, Carman whispered to Webster, Lige has seen the big trout, it’s lying in the throat of the millrace, and it’s rising!

There is no subterfuge for leaving the front pew inconspicuously in the middle of a church service. Webster and Hone looked at each other briefly, averted their eyes and stook awkwardly, and quietly filed out of the church. The minister stopped and the congregation watched the four men leave. Every eye in the church watched them slip out the panelled door, quietly closing its polished-brass latch, and and everyone in the pews knew about the big fish.

Some of the men soon followed, nodding shamefacedly toward the pulpit and their wives, and soon only the pious women and children were left. Finally the minister himself succumbed, giving a hasty benediction as he moved down the aisle, and the remaining congregation followed. It gathered by the river to watch, as Lige rowed Senator Webster and Mayor Hone into position above the millrace where the fish was lying.

Webster caught a small brookie, and the millpond congregation groaned, thinking the big trout had had been frightened.

Thirty minutes passed and most of the of the congregation began walking home, when Webster made a long cast toward the grist mill and the fish was hooked.

Like all brook trout, this fish fought stubbornly under the trailing weeds and along the masonry foundations of the mill, and finally Webster forced it into the open, gravel-bottomed channel in the elodea and pickerel-weed.

The struggle lasted almost as long as the church service and sermon, with cheers and groans from the congregation, and finally the huge trout came grudgingly toward the skiff. It was almost black from living in the dark masonwork shadows under the mill wheel, its mottled gill covers and white-edged orange fins moving weakly. The faithful Lige reached expertly with the long-handled boat net. His words when he slipped the trout into its meshes are are included on the Currier & Ives print that recorded the event, and were later placed in the Congressional Record. We hab you now, sar! Lige laughed.

The congregation stood cheering along the millpond, and Parson King threw his prayer book into the air. Sam Carman and Lige wrestled the fish ashore, and carried it to the general store. Legend holds that the fish weighed as much as the current world record of fourteen pounds eight ounces, but it seems unlikely at best. Carman and Hone traced its outlined on linen, and their tracing was later transferred to a cherrywood plank. The carpenter made another wooden facsimile of the fish, enlarging it a third to give it a proportion equal to its lofty place on the weathervane of the church steeple . . .

[Conclusion not yet copied.]

_____________________________

p. 1626

The cast of characters has probably been embellished too, and everyone knows that our Republic would collapse tomorrow if men who disliked each other totally refused each other’s company.

The old Wyandanche Club on the Nissequogue had some Webster memorabilia in its collection, and the principal artifact of his triump still exists at the Bellport Historical Society. It is the cherrywood weathervane carved for the Presbyterian Church to commemorate Webster’s fish, bearing its honest scars of lightning. Such artifacts would not exist if the story were totally a myth. pointless challenges in recent months too.

The content or format of this subpage last updated: 09/28/2012 15:07:49

The first chapter of Nick Kara’s 1997 book, Brook Trout, brings the telling of the Webster “trout” story to modern times. In the annotated version below, Dr. Richard A. Thomas extensively footnotes Kara’s work, providing insights into some of the characters and places of the story, and highlights conflicts with historical facts which tend to question the authenticity of some of the details which have crept into the tale since the 1800s.

Click for text in a new window view.

Early History of Yaphank Neck

Early History of Yaphank Neck

The eastern part of the Brookhaven and South Haven Hamlets, Town of Brookhaven, NY was not included in the Town’s “Old Purchase at the South” of 1664. A land sale to Samuel Terrill by the indigenous native Wopehege in 1688 completed the land purchases that now comprise the two hamlets. “Yamphank Neck” is the parcel of land between Yaphank Creek (aka Barteau Creek) on the west to the Connecticut River (now known as the Carman’s River) on the east. The community that became established on the neck was to become known as South Haven. Samuel Terrill can therefore be considered the founder of the Hamlet of South Haven, which was to become the commercial center of much of southern Brookhaven Town during the colonial period.

Unfortunately, five years later this same parcel also was included in the first patent from Governor Fletcher (the Patent of 1693) for the Manor of St. George granted to Col. William Smith ‘Tangier’ — the lands of this patent otherwise being on the east side of the Carman’s River. For two hundred years there were legal disputes because of the overlapping. The Neck remained theoretically under the jurisdiction of the Lord of the Manor until 1789 when the Manor was formally dissolved as a governmental unit and it’s land area annexed to the Town of Brookhaven by the newly independent government. As a practical matter, however, it appears from the Town records that the colonial Town trustees believed that the Neck was within their authority, and that the Neck was largely governed by the Town.

Shortly after Terrill acquired the land, a dam and mills were erected on the Connecticut River. Since Terrill was a blacksmith, not a miller, their establishment was likely done by others. No evidence has been found that Samuel Terrell actually established the mills. Since the “Tangier” Smith family claimed a clear title to the river bottom (if not the Yaphank Neck lands to the west), it is likely that the Smith family also had some ownership rights in the mill or leased use of the river. Normally, permission of the Town was required to dam a river and erect mills, and such a record has not been found. Perhaps this is a case where the Lord of the Manor exercised early authority. (Even today, surviving records of the “Tangier” Smith family have not been released for public research by the trustee of the Smith estate.)

What happened to Terrill’s ownership is unclear. Except for one action of the Town Trustees recorded on 11 April 1738, there is no other reference to Samuel Terrill in the Brookhaven Town records. The 1738 Town action may have been an attempt by the Town to clear Terrill’s title to Yaphank Neck for its sale.

On April 10, 1745 an indenture was entered in the records of the Town of Brookhaven by which Richard Floyd, Nicoll Floyd, and Mordecai Homan, Jr., sold to John Havens of Shelter Island, NY “Yamphank Neck.” Clearly by 1745 Terrill no longer had ownership (and the Town clearly thought it had legal jurisdiction over the Neck). The description of the boundary of the sale is identical with the original Wopehege deed, but now included “the Grist Mill, Saw Mill and fulling Mill: and all ye other-houses buildings orchards Gardens, Lands Meadows improvements profits Commodities Advantages.”

John Havens, “late of Shelter Island but now of the township of Brookhaven,” died about 1750. In his will he leaves Yaphank Neck to his sons Jonathan and Benjamin. “I leave to my sons Jonathan and Benjamin all my neck of land that I have now in possession in Brookhaven, with all buildings. My son Benjamin is to have the east part, bounded east by Connecticut river, or Seponack river, with all the houses and mills, and he shall pay all the money I owe towards this neck. My son Jonathan is to have the west part and a yoke of oxen, chains, etc.”

Ownership of Yaphank Neck, and in particular the mills on the Connecticut River, is uncertain after this point.

According to Bigelow, shortly before the Revolutionary War the mills became the property of the Homan family; however there are some details of this account that are questionable and do not agree with known facts. She may have confused the Homan interest with the earlier Mordecai Homan interest. Samuel Carman, Jr. did marry a Homan, however this would have been after his father apparently acquired the mills (Samuel Sr. apparently acquired the mills around 1790, Samuel, Jr. did not marry until 1812).. On the other hand, Bigelow may have received information from Carman descendants living at the time of her authorship, and therefore it should not be totally discounted. Bigelow also records that a number of people bought interest in the mills, including Thomas Ellison ( the elder).

Sometime after the Revolutionary War, Samuel Carman, Sr. acquired majority (or perhaps sole) interest in the property and the mills, which remained in the Carman family for a 100 years. Samuel Carman and family, originally from Hempstead, NY, were recorded in the 1790 census for the Town of Brookhaven, probably living in South Haven.

It is known that Joseph Conklin, a miller from Southold, NY, moved to South Haven, and that he left in his 1780 will his “movable estate” [personal property] to his “cousin, Jeremiah Havens” [actually his grand nephew], his sister Sarah’s grandson, and Jonathan Haven’s son. There was no mention in Joseph’s will of real estate or of any ownership interest in the mills. He may have just worked at the mills. Sarah was the wife of John Havens, and mother to Jonathan and Benjamin. Joseph appears never to have married. Jeremiah named his first son, born shortly after Joseph’s death in 1780, “Joseph Conklin Havens.” Joseph Conklin, and his sister “Mrs.” Elizabeth Conkline, were both interred in the South Haven Church cemetery. Elizabeth died in 1756, suggesting that she, and perhaps her brother, were both living in Southaven at that time; she was perhaps keeping house for her brother. It is unknown why her headstone is marked “Mrs.” or who “Mr.” Conkline might have been.

It is to be remembered that the period, 1775-1783, was the middle of the Revolutionary War, with much turmoil which must have had great impact on the life and business affairs of South Haven residents.

Waracta Neck and its relationship to Yaphank Neck

Samuel Terrill also acquired ownership of Waracta Neck, about 7 miles east of South Haven in Moriches, as described in this account from a history of the Moriches Presbyterian Church:

“The title to the land on which the extended village of Moriches is built was gained by three different patents. That lying between the Mastic River and the creek Senex was included in Smith’s first patent [the Patent of 1693]; that between Senex and the mill stream, called Barnes’ Mill Pond (formerly [and today] Terrill’s River) was included in Smith’s second patent [the Patent of 1697]; and that east of the latter point was covered by the patent given for land purchased by Messrs. Taylor, Townsend, and Willets, commonly known as Moriches patentship. During the first years of the 18th century the neck of land lying on the west of the mill stream was called Waracta, and was in possession of Samuel Terrill. The mill stream was named in his honor by the Indians called Paquatuck, and the land on the east of it was called Moriches or Maritches. To keep on friendly terms with the Indians, Chief John Mayhew was also paid ‘a competent sum of money for the land.’ “

This property and its owners offer interesting clues as to the ownership interests of the various families.

Terrill sold his Waracta Neck holdings to Sarah Scudder Conkling, widow of John Conkline, of the Town of Southold, by deed dated 5 Aug 1714, as mentioned in her will dated 19 Jan 1732, and proved 1 Apr 1755 . The dam and mills on the Terrill River were erected in 1737 by Oliver Smith, after Terrill sold the property. Waracta Neck, or the greater part of it, was said to have been eventually sold to a “John Havens.” However, it is unlikely that it was the same John Havens who owned the South Haven mills and Yaphank Neck — this latter John dies before Sarah; and there is no mention of the Moriches properties in his will. Interestingly though, Sarah is sister-in-law to the South Haven John Havens’ wife, Sarah Conkling Havens.

But by the late 19th century, the Moriches property was owned by John S. Havens; this John was the great-great grandson of the South Haven John Havens through his son John (Jonathan) who inherited the western half of Yaphank Neck. Much of Waracta Neck, known as the Havens Estate, remained undeveloped. It is today a County nature preserve and a camp for handicapped children (Camp Pa-Qua-Tuck sponsored by the Rotary Club of the Moriches.) And most of Samuel Terrill’s Yamphank Neck lands are also either public park lands (South Haven County Park), or nature preserve (the Wertheim National Wildlife Refuge).

Who was Samuel Terrill?

Was he Samuel Terrill of Milford, CT?

I have not determined for sure who Samuel Terrill might have been. But the most likely candidate seems to have been a Samuel Terrill, son of Roger and Abigail Ufford Terrill of Milford, New Haven County, CT. While there was Terrills in Southold, NY, I have yet to find any Samuels among them who are satisfactory candidates. The Milford Town records indicate that Samuel removed to the Town of Brookhaven. Some researchers record that he married in the Town of Brookhaven, and had children there.

Our Samuel was said to have been a blacksmith. His principal homestead and blacksmith shop were said to have been on the west shore of the Terrill River on Waracta Neck, in Moriches. However, the shop and homestead were said to have burned, and that he then removed to Yamphank Neck (perhaps this was the reason for the 1714 sale of Waracta Neck?). In addition to Yaphank and Waracta Necks, Samuel Terrill was said to have had other land holdings—by all accounts Samuel had excellent relations with the indigenous natives, and appeared to have been able to negotiate land purchases at what today would appear to have been very favorable terms.

“Goin’ Over” of the Connecticut or Carman’s River, South Haven

Where Was the “Goin’ Over?”

Since Colonial times, the road-crossing of the Connecticut River (now Carmans River) at South Haven was known as “The Goin’ Over.” There are several references to that term in early documents and travel accounts. I do not know if the term was generally applied to all significant river fords, or whether it came to be more particularly applied to the Connecticut River crossing at South Haven — but in my readings I personally have not seen it specifically applied to other river crossings in this rather specific “noun” context, not only as a place of crossing but more generally as a place of community.

In reading the various accounts, and looking at maps, it seems that there were at least three separate crossings over time — one a simple river ford south of the present Montauk Highway bridge, a wooden bridge north of the present bridge, and the contemporary concrete bridge. There may also have been a fourth crossing that utilized the South Haven mill dam.

This is truly a piece of trivia, but my curiosity has been piqued. Could I actually discover where these crossings were?

This is a picture of the “second goin’ over,” a wooden bridge, probably located north of the present concrete bridge. There may have been several iterations of this bridge, and it may have been first constructed early in the 19th century, but given the light wood construction, it would have had to have been regularly renewed. The picture is probably early 20th century, late 19th.
As motorized vehicles became prevalent in the early 20th century, it would, of necessity, have had to have been replaced with the present concrete bridge.

In this picture, I’ve always felt that you are looking south, or downstream. The old mill dam would be at your back, and the picture below would be to your right. I suppose I think so because there is no hint of a dam or mill structures on the other side of the bridge.

Montauk Highway Bridge Crossing Carmans River

Why do I think the wooden bridge was north of the present bridge? A satellite view and a picture provides clues ….

South Country Road and the Presbyterian Church at South Haven

Look carefully at the picture to the right, taken perhaps about 1900 or a bit earlier.
It is of the South Country Road (a.k.a. the Montauk Highway) in South Haven, and the old Presbyterian Church. The church was on the south side of the road, and it is therefore clear that you are looking west, and that the photographer is in the middle of the road to the east of the church. The road obviously curves. And I suspect nearly at the cameraman’s back is the wooden “goin’ over” bridge pictured above.

The modern Montauk Highway now continues on straight east at this point and now crosses the Carmans River just a bit to the left of this picture.

For several years I have traipsed around the Carmans River at South Haven, looking for archeological clues to how the roadways might have been originally arranged. Unfortunately, I thought, the Sunrise highway construction had so altered the site that visual clues were few. Even the memories of the old timers who knew the area well before the construction were dim and often conflicting. They remember the place “well,” but as a swimming hole with some old mill buildings. While they remember generally how Horseblock Road (sometime called Farm-to-Market Rd) merged into Montauk Highway at South Haven, and that the north-south River Rd. (Smith Road) was continuous through the hamlet, they never focused on what may have been remnants of old road right-of-ways, particularly with respect to where the by then defunct wood bridge “goin’ overs” might have been.
While it is likely that there still are site plans and maps in the files of the New York State Department of Transportation, these are not accessible to me at present.

It is clear from these accounts, however, that the mills and the associated dam was pretty much in the middle of the present Sunrise Highway. The original site of the South Haven Presbyterian Church is well known.

Recently, Google has made satellite views widely available through Google Earth. When I looked closely at the satellite view of South Haven, and compared the image with the photograph above, the evidence leaped at me.

In addition, the path defined by the dotted line is still maintained as a fishing access point by the New York State Conservation Department and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. You cans still walk the path of the old “goin’ over.”

Satellite views of the “Goin’ Over at South Haven

North is down

Tragic Death of Ira Gordon

Ira Gordon

As sometimes happens, when one looks into one story, another more-or-less unrelated story emerges. In this case, while Dr. Richard Thomas was researching the Hawkins family cemetery in Brookhaven hamlet, the short article to the right was uncovered:

This led to several questions:

While the location of the Harrison estate was well, known, who was Colonel Green?

While the members of the Post family were well known, who was Frederick Post?

This following is the “story” as developed by Dr. Thomas.

The Death of Ira Gordon, heir of Mrs. Emily O. Hawkins by Richard Thomas

First, the back story: Henrietta Green and her son Col. Edward Green

The Harrison estate on Beaver Dam Road, Brookhaven, NY was rented for the summer of 1920 by Col. Edward “Ned” Green, the son of the richest woman in the world, Henrietta “Hetty” Howland Robinson Green.
Col. Edward Green, son of the late Hetty Green, has leased the Harrison place on River Road [Beaver Dam Road], Brookhaven and will spend the season there.(Suffolk County News (Sayville), 18 Jun 1920, p. 6.)
Hetty’s mother, Abby (Howland) Robinson, was constantly ill, so her father, Edward Robinson, performed most of the parental duties. At the age of six, Hetty was reading the financial columns to her father and was instructed by him on what it all meant. By the time she was 15, she knew more about how to make money on Wall Street than the men who had spent most of their lives trying to do it.

Upon her father’s death, Hetty Robinson inherited most of the Howland fortune, $7.5 million dollars. Her maiden aunt controlled the rest, and when Aunt Sarah died and left her $2 million to New Bedford for libraries and school programs and to charities, Hetty challenged the will, and although not winning, did succeed in getting use of the income generated by the $2 million dollars until her death. The principal had to be held in trust until she died.

After the Civil War, the price of government bonds was depressed because of uncertainty in the cost of recovering from that war. Hetty had plenty of capital and invested heavily in US bonds and made $1.25 million in one year.

Hetty was generally not a speculator and did not look for a quick return. When asked how she made her fortune, she replied, “I buy cheap, and I sell dear.

When she read about how Chicago was rapidly expanding, she went to Illinois, determined where the boundaries of Chicago might extend in fifteen to twenty years, and bought up a great deal of property in that region while it was still cheap.

She studied the railroads and discovered that while the major railroads owned great expanses of their own track, there were many sections in the country where the railroads paid local companies to use their tracks. She determined where these small lengths of track existed that provided critical links in the systems of major carriers, then purchased them up, greatly raised the rates, and forced the railroads to buy back her railroads at a much increased price.

When she married at age 33, she insisted on a pre-nup agreement and made it be known that she would not cover her husband’s debts. Despite that, an old respected financial house on Wall Street, John J. Cisco & Son, where Hetty had $550,000 stored, did make large loans to her husband, and when he couldn’t pay them off, came calling on Hetty.

She would either have to bail them out or they would collapse. She let them collapse. Hetty removed what was left of her deposits from the institution and moved them to Chemical Bank. Even though it meant she would lose 25% of her deposits, Hetty decided that Cisco was not too big to fail, and she was not going to reward them for doing something that they had expressly promised not to do, loan money to her husband.

Along with what was left of her money in Cisco, she brought along, in a cab with two private detectives, millions of dollars of deposits to the Chemical Bank. In fact, it was more than the total of $23 million that Chemical Bank had on deposit at the time. The President of Chemical Bank met her at the door and offered her an office in the bank for her own use, but she preferred to use offices and rooms that happened to be empty so that no one would know exactly where she could be found, particularly tax collectors and lawyers. She hated lawyers, even her own. The bank assigned two young men to find which rooms Mrs. Green was using for the day and respond to her requests for information or for movement of funds.

She kicked her husband out of her house and never allowed him to return.

She was as miserly as her grandfather had been. When her son, Edward R. “Ned” Green, injured his knee sledding, she dressed him and herself in poor clothes and took him to the New York University Medical School charity ward to get free medical care. But she was recognized, so she said she would treat him herself and took him home.

The leg became infected and had to be amputated.

She taught Ned the basics of her conservative investment strategies by sending him to Texas in 1892 at age 25 to run the Texas-Midland railroad, a crucial 50-mile link in the Southern Pacific route run by Collis Potter Huntington .

Hetty and Ned put the squeeze on Huntington by not only raising his rates but also finding out what banks he used for his loans. Hetty would then deposit a million or so in that bank, leave it long enough for the bank to have loaned most of it out, then threaten to withdraw it, so the bank would be forced to call in Huntington’s loans.

Colonel Green’s wheel chair

Ned did not live frugally like his mother. He had a suite of rooms at a Dallas hotel. His mother feared that if Ned were to marry, the wife would squander the fortune she had accumulated. So Ned instead hired a “housekeeper,” and, after he and his housekeeper moved to larger quarters, he decided to hire another housekeeper, one younger than the one he already had.

Ned soon extended his control into the political life of Texas and was made the chairman of the Texas Republican Party. It was while he was in Texas that he was given the honorific title of “Colonel” by the governor.

His aging mother finally persuaded him to return to New York, where he occupied 16 rooms of the Waldorf-Astoria. There he promoted his housekeeper to “confidential secretary” and his other housekeeper to “guest.”

At the time of her death on 03 July 1916, Hetty Green had a net worth of $100 million to $200 million dollars (somewhere between $2 and $4 billion in today’s dollars).

Colonel Edward Green in his car in Dallas,
the first gasoline-powered car to appear in that city.

Martha Howland

Another Howland relative, Martha Howland, purchased property on the north side of Beaver Dam Road nearly opposite the Harrison property,the William Brewster Rose property later known as the Ford estate. Martha had married Isaac Howland, who was a distant relative. When Isaac and Martha Howland purchased it, it included the farm behind our house (later owned by the Wellingtons). Martha was related to the ancestors of Hetty Green closely enough to inherit $12,000 upon Hetty Green’s death. As far as I know, their ownership of the Brewster Rose property was unrelated to Colonel Green’s leasing the Harrison place.

Emily O. (Green) Hawkins

The Azel Hawkins cemetery was reserved to the heirs and assigns of Mrs. Emily O. (Green) Hawkins (wife of George M. Hawkins). (No relationship between Emily O. Green and Colonel Edward Green has been established.)

George M. and Emily O. Hawkins had two children:

Eliza Matilda, born about 1865, and
Annie R., born about 1874.

[About 1885,] Eliza married Albert F. Perine, born about 1863, and moved to Brooklyn, where Albert worked in a jewelry store. Eliza and Albert had six children, only four of whom lived to adulthood;

Edith M., born about 1888,
George Albert, born 28 Aug 1893, [he married Bertha McKeown of Brookhaven hamlet]
William Freeman, born 09 Nov 1895, and
Aida M., born about 1898.

In about 1896, the second daughter, Annie R., married a local boy, Frederick B. “Fred” Gordon, born about 1874. He was the son of Sylvester Gordon, who was the son of Jeremiah Gordon, both residents of Fire Place. Their first son was born in Connecticut, but they appear to have resided in Brookhaven hamlet after 1898. Their children were:

Ira B., born 01 Aug 1897 in Connecticut,
Ernest Frederick, born 11 Apr 1899, died in San Diego in 1977,
Lydia D., born about 1904;
Madeline E., born about 1905; and
Antoinette A., “Nettie”, born about 1910.

After 1900 the family lived in Brookhaven hamlet. Fred Gordon died sometime between 1910 and 1920.

Ira Gordon’s Death

In July 1920, Fred and Annie’s oldest son, Ira Gordon, died in a motorcycle accident.

BROOKHAVEN MAN KILLED BY AUTO
Ira Gordon, Motorcyclist, Struck by Kost’s Car
Victim Survived Accident Two Days—
Coroner Trying to Place Responsibility.

Ira Gordon of Brookhaven, aged 23, died Wednesday morning in Babylon hospital from the effects of a collision between a motorcycle he was riding and an automobile owned and driven by Frederick Kost, a summer resident of Brookhaven, which occurred Monday morning near the latter’s home on the Montauk Highway [Kost’s home was actually on Beaver Dam Road].

Mr. Gordon was on his way to Colonel Green’s, on the Harrison estate [about one half mile further east], where he was employed at the time of the fatal accident. He was passing the end of the driveway at Kost’s place when Mr. Kost came out in his car and struck the motorcycle, forcing it across the road and throwing the rider heavily to the concrete roadway.

The front of the Kost place is lined with a tall hedge which obscures the view from the road into the driveway and vice versa, and motorcyclist and automobilist were unable to see each other until their machines were almost together. Mr. Gordon sustained a broken hip and internal injuries. He was rushed to the hospital and at first it appeared that he was doing as well as could be expected, but during Tuesday night he had a relapse.

The young man, who was well known in Brookhaven and the neighboring villages, was a son of Mrs. Annie Gordon and the late Fred Gordon. He leaves his mother, a brother, Ernest Gordon, and three sisters, the Misses Lydia, Madaline, and Nettie Gordon, all of Brookhaven.

Coroner Moore of Bay Shore called an inquest into the circumstances of the fatal accident Wednesday, but not much progress was made as through some misunderstanding Mr. Kost did not get word of the proceeding and was out of town. The examination has been postponed to next Monday.

The funeral is being held this afternoon, with service at the Patchogue Methodist church in charge of the Rev. Dr. William H. Barton and interment in the Yaphank cemetery.

Long Island Advance (Patchogue), 30 Jul 1920, page 1.

Guest Houses

Eastern Long Island during the middle to late nineteenth century, especially its south shore, had long been a place of Summer homes and resort hotels; however, the difficulties of travel had limited their patrons to the more wealthy of society. With the advent of expanded rail road service during the latter part of the nineteenth century, this changed dramatically.

While the Long Island Rail Road extended service to Greenport in 1844, its original purpose was to create a “fast” rail/ferry/rail connection from New York to Boston. The needs of Long Island itself were ignored and the chosen route was through the vast, level, but mostly unpopulated plains of the center of Long Island, midway between the established communities of the north and south shores. To maintain fast service, stops were relatively infrequent (there was, however, a station at Yaphank just to the north of Brookhaven hamlet). Eventually, a direct rail link to Boston was construction through Connecticut, and the raison d’être for the LIRR ceased. Other competing rail lines and LIRR branches were constructed; the South Side railroad had extended service as far east as Patchogue by 1869. However, it lacked a convenient western terminus with access to the East River. The various branches and routes were not economically viable, and eventually were merged into a single system. In 1879-1981 the rail line to Patchogue was extended east to Eastport, with stations at Bellport and Brookhaven, finally arriving in Montauk in 1895.

The establishment of rail service along the South Shore made vacationing convenient even for folks of modest means. Hotels and guest houses burgeoned in every community along the south shore, including Brookhaven. The former farming and fishing hamlet became a popular destination, especially for those looking for a “rural” environment. In just a few short years, the fundamental character of the community changed.

Historic Guest Houses of Brookhaven and South Haven, L.I., New York

Name Address Proprietor Site Code
Beaver Dam Lodge 331 Beaver Dam Road Esther Hayes Wickham B18A Beaver Dam Lodge was operated by Mrs. Esther Wickham nee Hayes, who had been a proprietor the Edgewater Inn (Br17.1-S) before 1927. In 1927 she rented the property from Ellen Learned. There are frequent mentions of it from 1927-1929. It appeared to have operated year around, while the Edgewater Inn apparently was only open during the Summer months. It appears to have ceased functioning as a guest house after 1929.
Brookhaven Farm and Tea Room ? ? ? Newspaper account suggests it operated as a guest house in 1927 and earlier.
Bedetty House 352 Beaver Dam Rd. Herbert Badetty Br29A Bigelow, p. 44
Edgewater Inn 349 Beaver Dam Rd. Mrs. Rachael (Purdy) De Arcas Br17.1-S Destroyed by fire 4 Apr 1928. (Advance 6 Apr 1928)
Fire Place Inn 359 South Country Rd. Mrs. Amy B. (Smith) de Arcas Br08 She was daughter-in-law to Rachael de Arcas, proprietor of the Edgewater Inn.
Green Shutters ? ? ? Newspaper article suggests that it was open in 1926 and earlier.
Hawkins House 311 Beaver Dam Rd. Mrs. Arthur Kaufman
Mrs. H. E. Hawkins?
Br20 It is not certain that this residence was operated as a guest house. Mr. and Mrs. Jesse Johnson appear to have maintained it as a private residence until Mrs. Johnson’s death (after 1948.) Thereafter it may have been a boarding house. Mrs. Irene Hawkins Johnson was a daughter to Mr. and Mrs. Herman Hawkins.
While some have said that a Mrs. Kaufman operated the Hawkins house as a guest house, it appears as if the Kaufmans did not remove to Brookhaven from Staten Island until March 1944, living first with Frederick Kost’s sister Minna, on Beaver Dam road, then in a new house built on Mott lane; no evidence has been found that she operated a guest house. While it was said that Mrs. Kaufman was Frederick Kost’s sister, this appears not to be true, although they were related—probably Mr. Kaufman was a cousin.
No confirmatory evidence yet has been found that either of Frederick Kost’s sisters, Emma or Minna, operated a guest house, and it seems doubtful
It is not definite that Mrs. Hawkins was a proprietor of this establishment, although it is said that she was a proprietor of a guest house.
Hunters Lodge 2847 Montauk Highway Gardner Murdock SH08 From about 1928-1929 through the 1930’s, it was operated as a boarding house and inn, known as the Hunters Inn.
Holy Trinity Holiday House 311 South Country Rd. Holy Trinity Church, Brooklyn? Br09F.1-S Torn down after WW II.
Michelson House “Lark Shores” Beaver Dam Rd., at the Carman’s River Bernardine B. Michelsen. Br16.2-S Previously known as Carman House, then Lush House, both private residences. Destroyed by fire, mid-1960s.
Robin’s Inn ? ? ? Mention in Patchogue Advance, 22 Jun 1928, p. 14: “Robin’s Inn was very busy over the week-end catering to city guests who arrived by auto.”
Starke’s Hotel – “Shore Acres” ~150 Bay Ave. Charles P. Starke Br38.150-S
Swan’s Hotel Beaver Dam road ? ? Bigelow, p. 44 Also mentioned Advance, 15 Aug, 1941, p. 12.

The content or format of this subpage last updated: 08/23/2014 14:08:36

Fire Place as Historic District: 1985 essay by Arthur Danto

Brookhaven Hamlet as Historical District
by Arthur Danto

Brookhaven Hamlet includes an area with so unmistakable a character that, when one has entered it, there is an immediate awareness of being in a place different in feeling from what surrounds it.

Externally, this area is a wedge of land bounded, counterclockwise, by the Great South Bay, the Carman’s River, Old Stump Road, South Country Road, and the east end of the Loman Farm. It is roughly bisected by the Beaver Dam Road, a gently meandering path going west from Squassux Landing and over the South Country Road.

Internally, the hamlet is marked by woods and waters, marshes and open fields, grand trees, barns, modest churches, and houses which express the spirit of an older, pre-suburban form of life. The houses are too widely spaced to be a village, yet not so distant from one another as to form a rural network. It is, precisely, a hamlet, and as such it retains a quality of existence vanished, or rapidly vanishing, from the tong Island of which it once was typical. Much of the area where land meets water falls under the protective legislation for marshland and wildlife, so there is a reasonable expectation that our shoreline, otherwise so vulnerable to developers, will retain its integrity indefinitely. Further, by a combination of miracle and community awareness, Brookhaven Hamlet has maintained against the forces of development—the tract housing, the shopping mall, the gentrified result—an authentic air of tranquil resistance our fathers and grandfathers took for granted, but which we today cannot.

It is because our hamlet is one of the few surviving instances of an endangered species that its members are requesting it be recognized as meriting the protective status of an historical district. It is not the desire of the residents of Brookhaven Hamlet to stop time or to turn the clock back. But we recognize that the luck that has enabled the hamlet to survive cannot be counted on to last, and the community must take some responsibility for its maintenance, to have some measure of control over the future, so the natural sort of growth and change which have brought about its cherished atmosphere may continue.

This atmosphere surrounds a community that is an intersection of distinct but harmonizing cultures: It is agricultural without being a farming community. There is a life of the bay with out its being a fishing village. There is a population of scientists from Brookhaven National Laboratory without it being an intellectual enclave. There are artists and writers without it being an artists’ colony. Nor is it a dormitory town or a resort. It is a unified society precious for its variousness.

Beaver Dam Road epitomizes the quality of the hamlet in that it is, in one sense, a country road, without sidewalks or streetlights; while, at the same time, it is a genuine working thoroughfare, with a steady flow of cars and trucks, school—buses and boat trailers. Finally, it has the air of a parkway, with heavy trees and gracious vistas—a road for tourists who are struck by the beauty of its short length. And, at its end, historical Squassux Landing is also an active place—a center for the community, a docking area for clammers and fishermen, a shelter for pleasure boats, and a place to watch the marshlife. Just beside Squassux is a boatworks which conveys the sense of another century, while from its rickety docks one sees out across water and grass as it must have looked to Indians.

In sum, ours is an authentic American hamlet, where nature and human comfort exist side by side, where the realities of time and change are accommodated without shock, and where the beauties of ordinary life can be enjoyed without artifice or fear. As a hamlet, it has as much right to its continued identity as an historical building or shrine, a place of natural beauty or a threatened species. It is like a memory which is not merely of the past, but part of the experience of the present, which deserves to be saved for the future.

Fatal Fire, 31 May 1947

On 31 May 1947 a fire destroyed a house on the northwest corner of Beaver Dam and Old Stump Roads. All four members of the Donald Barry family were killed. Residents of the east wing of the house escaped.

The lot on which the house stood remains vacant to the present time.

Donald J. Barry was a son of William and Lillian Velzora Murdock Barry. His wife was Dorothy Allen Swezey, a daughter of Everett and Lila Swezey. Dorothy’s first husband was Lawrence Costa, who was killed in action on 12 June 1944 during WW II.

This article is a transcript of the account in the Patchogue Advance, 5 June 1947.

Patchogue Advance, 5 June 1947. Page 1.

Family of Four Claimed by Fire; 3 Others Escape

Heater Thought to be Cause of Brookhaven Tragedy; Vet, Wife, 2 Children Die.

Flaming death claimed a family of four, trapped in their burning rooms in a 4:15 a. m. fire Saturday at Beaver Dam road and Yaphank avenue [now known as Old Stump Road], Brookhaven. Three members of another family escaped, but lost all their possessions excepting a baby carriage. The fire was believed to have been caused by a poorly-regulated kerosene water heater.

Victims of the fire are:
Donald Barry, aged 28; his wife Dorothy, aged 26; and her two children by a former marriage, Lawrence Costa, aged 6, and Thomas Costa, aged 3.

wakened by Daughter
Awakened by the cries of their infant daughter, Denise, aged 10 months, Ernest Leger, aged 41, and his wife Jacqueline, aged 25, managed to escape the burning house. A son, John, aged 4, was staying with his grandmother in Yaphank.

After calling the Fire department, Mr. Leger rescued his wife and baby from their smoke-filled room in the east section of the two-story frame building.

Although he could hear Mr. Barry’s frantic calls for help, Mr. Leger’s attempts to enter the Barry’s section were useless. Flame and smoke repeatedly prevented their rescue, driving him back repeatedly from the door and from windows which he smashed with an axe.

Flames enveloped the house when Brookhaven Fire department, let by Chief Paul Robinson, arrived at 4:30. It was impossible to enter the blazing building. A call to the Bellport Fire department brought a pumper and hook and ladder immediately under the direction of Chief Donald Shaw.

The house collapsed shortly after the firemen’s arrival. Water drawn from the nearby Carman river failed to check the fire.

Two loud explosions, believed to be of kerosene tanks, awakened a neighbor, Mrs. Alan Baker, at about 4:15 a. m. She aroused her husband, thinking the noises were shots. From their window they could see the burning house. Dressing hastily they arrived as Mr. Leger was attempting unsuccessfully to enter the Barry quarters.

Badly burned, the four bodies of the Barry family members were identifiable only by size and by rings worn. Mr. Barry was found bent over one child on the bedroom floor. The other child was in the bathtub, where his mother had apparently placed him in an attempt to save his life.

After Coroner Grover A. Silliman arrived, the bodies were taken to the C. W. Ruland Sons funeral home in Patchogue.
Chief Edward N. Bridge of the Brookhaven Town police; Investigator John L. Barry of the district attorney’s office; Lt. Arthur Waldron of the Brookhaven Town police; and two cars of patrolmen, investigated the fire.

The Barry’s kerosene hot water heater, which police believe was the cause of the blaze, was found with both burners turned to the “Light” position. Because it was left at this position, the gravity-fed flow of oil seeped from the burner, ignited, and caused the fire. If the heater had had a safety valve, or if the burners had been adjusted after they were lit, the disastrous fire might not have occurred.

At midnight, according to Ledger, Barry made coffee on the stove and invited him over for a cup. He accepted and later on said, “Good night,” and returned to his side of the house where he retired. It is believed the Mr. Barry forgot to turn the valves down which caused the oil to flood the burners.

Mr. Barry was a well-liked employee of the Brook Store, operated by Thomas Lyons on the South Country road, Brookhaven. An Army pilot during the war, he won the Distinguished Flying Cross. He is survived by his father and mother, Mr. and Mrs. William Barry of Brookhaven, and his brother, William Barry, of Bay Shore. Mrs. Barry is survived by her mother, Mrs. Everett Swezey of Locust avenue, Brookhaven.

Services for the Barrys were held at 3 p.m. Sunday at the Brookhaven Presbyterian church, the Rev. R. B. Gamewell officiating. Interment of the four fire victims was at Woodland cemetery in Bellport.

Neighbors Offer Aid
Sympathetic neighbors immediately came to the relief of Ernest Leger and his family after they lost their entire possessions in Saturday morning’s tragic fire in Brookhaven. The Brookhaven Red Cross chapter has offered assistance and a fund has been collected for the Ledgers by Thomas Lyons and Alex Kosenkranius. Mr. Kosenkranius is Mr. Leger’s employer. Wearing apparel is also being collected.

Mrs. H. M. Raynor’s Diary

Mrs. H. M. Raynor (Hannah Reeve Raynor) lived in Brookhaven Hamlet for much of her later adult life. She was the second wife of Edward S. Raynor, a merchant. They were married between 1860 and 1870. She had children by her first husband, Stephen Craft, and one child by her marriage to Edward. Their home was on on the northeast corner of South Country and Beaver Dam Roads. It is no longer extant.

She faithfully maintained a simple diary from 1883 to 1906. There are 116 pages in the diary. While at first it appears to be just a daily weather report, as one reads on a sense of her daily life and the routine of the community develops.

She referred most of the time to people by their first names or short-hand abbreviations. Unless you should happen to have an intimate knowledge of her family and neighbors, it is often difficult to identified exactly whom many of them may have been. Fortunately, we have an annotated transcription made by Charles Peter Raynor (Pete). Through his considerable research effort, most of the folks have been identified. Click on the Pete Raynor Transcription icon at the bottom of each page to view both his transcription of the page and his comments. He has also prepared additional commentary, and an index of names and places, which appears at the end of the diary itself. The latest version of his work is dated October 2013.

Click the Table of Contents icon at the bottom of each page for a table of contents sorted by page number.

The original of this Diary is in the possession of Barbara and Pete Berman, East Patchogue, NY 11772. The scanning of this document was done by Marty Van Lith from the original in February 2006.

Irma D. Newey Diary

Irma D. Newey was sixteen when she wrote this diary in 1904. She was a daughter of William Shepherd (Shepp) and Mary Newey. They may have lived at 312 Beaver Dam Road, Brookhaven Hamlet (Historic Structure ID Br21), although this has not been confirmed. The diary covers the period from March through October, 1904, with a few supplemental entries in December, 1904, and 1905-1906.

Well written for a girl of sixteen, it reveals much about the life of a teenager in a small Long Island hamlet at the turn of the century.

Irma’s father was a bayman, and during the period of this diary was employed as a government life saver on Fire Island at the Smith’s Point station. Irma become a teacher and an assistant principal of Public School 156 in Brooklyn. She served 44 years in the Brooklyn schools system. She was briefly married to a Mr. Nelson sometime after 1910, but was divorced by 1920. She never remarried, and died Christmas day, 1949, it is said of a heart attack.

The scanning of this document was done by Marty Van Lith, from the original. There are 244 pages in the diary.

Clicking on the home at the bottom of the page will display a table of contents sorted by date.

Brookhaven Congregational Church Minutes (1848)

The following copy of the Fire Place (now Brookhaven), New York, Congregational Church minutes of March 27, 1848 recorded the purchase of the “Lecture Hall” from Richard Corwin, Jr. His father, Richard Corwin Sr., died on October 27, 1848

While this building, now a private dwelling known as Chapel House, was said by some sources to have been originally built by the Congregationalists, the evidence of the minutes strongly suggests that it was built by either Richard Corwin, Sr. or his son, Richard Corwin Jr. before 1840 for the use of the Congregationalists society, and only later purchased by them. The building was built on the southwest corner of the Corwin farm, close to and on the east side of South Country road. The building was small. The lot was only 20′ x 30′.

Presbyterian Church lecture hall or chapel house, formerly the Congregational Church meeting house, as it appeared in the 1940s. Now a private residence.

It was deeded to the Presbyterians in the late 19th century when the Congregational society became defunct, Some suggest it was moved by them to its present site at the intersection of South Country Road and Chapel Avenue; this statement is misleading. While the Presbyterians did eventually move it, it was only moved perhaps twenty feet or so back from the road after purchasing a small amount of additional land, making the siting more convenient.

Richard Corwin had a large farm in Fire Place which may have extended as far north as Old Town Road. He appears to have stayed a member of the Presbyterian Church throughout his life. However, his son, William H. Corwin, seems to have been among the original organizers of the Congregationalists.

It wasn’t until 1848 that the small congregation may have had sufficient resources to purchase the building.

Not all of the subscribers recorded in the minutes were Congregationalists. Some were known to have been affiliated with the Presbyterians or another denomination, or were unaffiliated community members.

Brookhaven Congregational Church 1848 Minutes